<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>OzRadOnc - new forum threads</title>
		<link>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/start</link>
		<description>Threads in forums of the site &quot;OzRadOnc&quot; - A collection of thoughts and notes</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 00:14:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-1555818</guid>
				<title>Effective Field Size</title>
				<link>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-1555818/effective-field-size</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 15:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Shinobi09</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2432513</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>A collimated field size is 10 x 10cm. 30% of the field is blocked. The effective field size is approximately how many cm?</p> <p>Seriously hv no idea how to do this<br /> Any tips?</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-1555025</guid>
				<title>Patient treatment with photon beam</title>
				<link>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-1555025/patient-treatment-with-photon-beam</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 01:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Shinobi09</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2432513</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p><strong>1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data</strong><br /> Doing some past papers but I got stuck to this question! Any medical physicists can give me a hand please?</p> <p>A patient is treated with a 6MVphoton beam, <strong>12.5 x 12.5cm</strong> at <strong>110cm</strong> <strong>(Source to Axis Distance: SAD)</strong> to a <strong>9cm depth</strong>. The machine is calibrated to deliver <strong>1.0cGy per MU at 100cm for a 10 x 10cm field</strong>. The number of <strong>monitor units</strong> required to deliver <strong>150cGy</strong> at the isocentre is?</p> <p><strong>Given the information below:</strong><br /> <strong>Tissue Maximum Ratio (TMR) for 6Mv Photons</strong></p> <table class="wiki-content-table"> <tr> <td><strong>Depth (cm)</strong></td> <td><strong>10 x 10cm</strong></td> <td><strong>12 x12cm</strong></td> <td><strong>14 x 14cm</strong></td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>1.5</strong></td> <td><strong>1.0000</strong></td> <td><strong>1.0000</strong></td> <td><strong>1.0000</strong></td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>9.0</strong></td> <td><strong>0.810</strong></td> <td><strong>0.818</strong></td> <td><strong>0.824</strong></td> </tr> </table> <p>A. 183<br /> B. 210<br /> C. 247<br /> D. 221</p> <p><strong>2. Relevant equations</strong><br /> MU = DOSE / ( OUTPUT FACTOR X SAD FACTOR)<br /> SAD FACTOR = (SAD/ SAD + D)2</p> <p><strong>3. The attempt at a solution</strong><br /> Tried using the equations to solve but still not getting the correct answer which is supposed to be 221.<br /> I got 183 but without using the SAD factor.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-1555023</guid>
				<title>Patient treatment with photon beam</title>
				<link>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-1555023/patient-treatment-with-photon-beam</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 01:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Shinobi09</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2432513</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p><strong>1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data</strong><br /> Doing some past papers but I got stuck to this question! Any medical physicists can give me a hand please?</p> <p>A patient is treated with a 6MVphoton beam, 12.5 x 12.5cm at 110cm (Source to Axis Distance: SAD) to a 9cm depth. The machine is calibrated to deliver 1.0cGy per MU at 100cm for a 10 x 10cm field. The number of monitor units required to deliver 150cGy at the isocentre is?</p> <p>Given the information below:<br /> Tissue Maximum Ratio (TMR) for 6Mv Photons<br /> Depth (cm) <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">&#8212; 10 x 10cm -</span>- 12 x12cm <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">&#8212;14 x 14cm<br /> 1.5 -</span><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">-</span><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">-</span>&#8212; 1.0000 <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">-</span><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">- 1.0000 -</span><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">-</span>-1.000<br /> 9.0 <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">-</span><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">-</span><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">-</span> 0.810 <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">-</span><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">-</span> 0.818 <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">-</span><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">-</span> 0.824</p> <p>A. 183<br /> B. 210<br /> C. 247<br /> D. 221</p> <p><strong>2. Relevant equations</strong><br /> MU = DOSE / ( OUTPUT FACTOR X SAD FACTOR)<br /> SAD FACTOR = (SAD/ SAD + D)2</p> <p><strong>3. The attempt at a solution</strong><br /> Tried using the equations to solve but still not getting the correct answer which is supposed to be 221.<br /> I got 183 but without using the SAD factor.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-1285610</guid>
				<title>Energy of the secondary electrons in soft tissue from MV beams</title>
				<link>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-1285610/energy-of-the-secondary-electrons-in-soft-tissue-from-mv-bea</link>
				<description>Could anyone please give me the references for the 6 MV data in your section 8.3.2 &quot;Descriptors Of Dose Distribution Photon Beam Charts</description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2015 22:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>avisioli</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2209070</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Hello, I am writing from London but trained at the PeterMac. I am trying to work out what happens in tumour when hit by 4 - 6&#160;MV beam in the presence of gold nanoparticles. Hence my interest in section 8.3.2 (webpage above) where it appears that the average secondary electron liberated by 6&#160;MV photon has 1- 2 MeV. Could anyone please give me the references where all this data (energy of secondary electrons page 8.3.2 ONLY) comes from, as I need to quote it for possible PhD presentation. Many thanks for your hep and any input.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-863534</guid>
				<title>Normalisation</title>
				<link>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-863534/normalisation</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 15:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>sildking</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>1560983</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Can anyone explain to me, in simple terms, what is meant by normalisation in radiotherapy planning?Is the norm point the same thing as the ICRU ref point?</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-841560</guid>
				<title>Missing equation</title>
				<link>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-841560/missing-equation</link>
				<description>Scatter-Air Ratio</description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 18:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>makika8</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>1868397</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>At the end of the topic 8.6 - Photon Beam Calculations the formula of scatter air ratio is missing. Could anyone fix this problem?</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-779478</guid>
				<title>Ongoing Work</title>
				<link>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-779478/ongoing-work</link>
				<description>This site will continued to be updated over time</description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 02:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Leinna</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>528287</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Hello everyone.</p> <p>The site will continue to be updated over time.</p> <p>If you have any comments, suggestions, or want to contribute please let me know.</p> <p>There are still large areas that are incomplete, particularly in the medical expert / phase 2 / clinical oncology sections.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-656808</guid>
				<title>Short term training in Radiation Oncology</title>
				<link>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-656808/short-term-training-in-radiation-oncology</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 08:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Dr Harmeet Singh</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>1639890</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Hi,<br /> I am a qualified Radiation Oncologist from India with 10 years of post graduate experience in the field. I need some information on Short term training in Radiation Oncology for international medical graduates.<br /> It will be really nice if some body can provide me some information and help for the same.<br /> Thanks</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-643420</guid>
				<title>Nesting of cancer pathology</title>
				<link>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-643420/nesting-of-cancer-pathology</link>
				<description>Is it possible to move cancer pathologies into different categories?</description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 01:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Leinna</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>528287</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>When I open up the &quot;Pathology&quot; tab of the &quot;Diagnosis&quot; section of Patient Manager, the first category is &quot;Cell Histology&quot;.</p> <p>There are three drop-down boxes:</p> <ul> <li>Cell Category</li> <li>Cell Type</li> <li>Cell Grade</li> </ul> <p><strong>Cell Category</strong> gives a drop down list of cell pathology categories (e.g. adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma) that are pertinent to the ICD-O site selected. When selected, this influences the options in the &quot;Cell Type&quot; drop down box. I'm concerned that for some tumour types (e.g. testicular tumours) the &quot;Cell Category&quot; box is not very helpful (it gives Seminoma, Embryonal Carcinoma, Teratoma, Malignant Teratoma), grouping Yolk Sac Tumour under Embryonal Tumours and not including choriocarcinoma at all.</p> <p>Is there any way to edit this options as the administrator or is it 'hard wired' into the software?</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-627383</guid>
				<title>Inverse square law and percentage depth dose</title>
				<link>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-627383/inverse-square-law-and-percentage-depth-dose</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 01:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>sildking</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>1560983</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Hi fairly new to this so bear with me&#8230;.im currently in my second year of a UK therapeutic radiotherapy degree and am kinda stuck with a physics essay. I have to talk about the factors that affect depth dose distribution within the body, and just cannot get my head around how as distance from the source increases,the beam becomes more penetrative as the influence of the square law reduces??</p> <p>If anybody on here can explain this to me in really simple terms, id be seriously grateful!!</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-572703</guid>
				<title>Training programme</title>
				<link>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-572703/training-programme</link>
				<description>Hi, I ws wondering if anyone had any useful tips for getting in the radiation oncology training programme? Any advice would be greatly appreciated!</description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 23:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Raj deva</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>1458223</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Hi, I ws wondering if anyone had any useful tips for getting in the radiation oncology training programme? Any advice would be greatly appreciated!</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-429428</guid>
				<title>in-vivo dosimetry with diodes</title>
				<link>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-429428/in-vivo-dosimetry-with-diodes</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 10:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Katusha</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>1277713</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Hi! I am new here and didn't know where to post this.<br /> First of all - thanks to the organiser! - Good project for trainees!</p> <p>In the section '11.10.9 - In Vivo Dosimetry' I read this: 'Diodes are also relatively small and have the benefit of an instantaneous readout. Their disadvantage is the need to connect them to a power supply during dose delivery.'</p> <p>This is not quite correct: diodes do not require exteral power/voltage. They are connected to an electrometer which enables to take diode readings.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-420107</guid>
				<title>Benign (non-neoplastic) Disease treated with Radiotherapy</title>
				<link>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-420107/benign-non-neoplastic-disease-treated-with-radiotherapy</link>
				<description>A list of other diseases apart from gynaecomastia</description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 22:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>AAM</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>61952</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <ul> <li>Ankylosing Spondylitis</li> <li>Plantar Fasciitis</li> <li>Hypersalivation</li> <li>Heterotopic Ossification</li> <li>Keloid</li> <li>Hidradenitis suppurativa</li> <li>Graves Ophthalmopathy</li> <li>Macular Degeneration</li> <li>Arterio-venous Malformation</li> </ul> <p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Neoplastic benign conditions include</span>:</p> <ul> <li>Pituitary Adenoma</li> <li>Warts</li> <li>Langerhans Cell/Histiocytosis X</li> <li>Giant cell tumours</li> </ul> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-384776</guid>
				<title>algorithms</title>
				<link>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-384776/algorithms</link>
				<description>RADIOTHERAPY TREATMENT PLANNING ALGORITHM</description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 07:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>kalaiselvi</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>1154092</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Dear sir,<br /> can you explain the dose calculation algorithm in external plan radiotherapy and how we can calculate anisotropy function in brachy therapy..</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-374885</guid>
				<title>Mobile phone apps</title>
				<link>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-374885/mobile-phone-apps</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 01:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Hunterhound</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>1043054</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I've seen a few different apps for Rad Onc calculations, each one a bit different but serves its purpose nicely when the PC is not nearby. I got one on the Droid market called B.E.D. Calculator that works just fine for doing some quick dose comparisons. What apps have you found useful, or what kind of app would you like to see created that you think you would actually use?</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-356240</guid>
				<title>Back online</title>
				<link>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-356240/back-online</link>
				<description>Back in business</description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 09:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Leinna</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>528287</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Hey, I don't know if anyone still comes here (wouldn't blame you) but the site is again active and can be joined. The forums are also up for discussing questions or bringing errors to attention!</p> <p>I won't be posting any more assignment answers however.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-298881</guid>
				<title>Radiocurability</title>
				<link>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-298881/radiocurability</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 05:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>lachiemcd</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>677391</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Hi,</p> <p>Great website.. Has come in very handy.. I was wondering where you got your definitions for radiocurability and radioresponsiveness?</p> <p>Thanks</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-288587</guid>
				<title>Pathology study proforma</title>
				<link>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-288587/pathology-study-proforma</link>
				<description>What bits of pathology need to be discovered for pathology study</description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 10:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>AAM</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>61952</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <ul> <li>Organ</li> <li>History of the disease <ul> <li>what happened in the past?</li> </ul> </li> <li>Incidence <ul> <li>Risk groups <ul> <li>genetic syndromes</li> <li>endemic groups</li> </ul> </li> <li>Characteristic presentations</li> <li>Associated pathologies)</li> </ul> </li> <li>Prevalence</li> <li>Prognosis</li> <li>Risk Factors <ul> <li>Behaviours</li> <li>Substances <ul> <li>Natural</li> <li>Social</li> <li>Therapeutic</li> <li>Industrial</li> </ul> </li> <li>Infections</li> <li>Infestations</li> <li>Trauma</li> <li>Congenital conditions</li> </ul> </li> <li>Pathogenesis</li> <li>Diagnosis</li> <li>Histopathology <ul> <li>Cellular Classification <ul> <li>types</li> <li>variants</li> </ul> </li> <li>Risk features</li> <li>Prognsotic features</li> <li>Cell markers</li> </ul> </li> <li>Staging <ul> <li>prognostic factors</li> </ul> </li> <li>Natural History <ul> <li>detection</li> <li>Screening</li> <li>Presentation</li> <li>Patterns of spread</li> <li>Management</li> <li>Influence of pathology on Treatment options</li> <li>Metastatic patterns</li> <li>Methods of death</li> </ul> </li> <li>Imaging <ul> <li>characteristic patterns</li> <li>sample images</li> </ul> </li> </ul> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-284372</guid>
				<title>abscopal effect</title>
				<link>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-284372/abscopal-effect</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 10:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>tweezels</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>596260</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>hi there. excellent website. thanks so much for publishing it.</p> <p>i was wondering where you got your info for the abscopal effect? it's not indexed in any of the books i've read, and the distant bystander effect is the closest thing i can find, but that doesn't sound the same as the abscopal effect.</p> <p>thanks</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-272725</guid>
				<title>Surface dose for photon beams</title>
				<link>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-272725/surface-dose-for-photon-beams</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 23:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>tara1</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>541773</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Hi - quick question&#8230;<br /> What is the surface dose for your 18MV photon beam?</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-269619</guid>
				<title>Physics tutorial links not working</title>
				<link>http://ozradonc.wikidot.com/forum/t-269619/physics-tutorial-links-not-working</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 07:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>tara1</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>541773</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Well done on creating this site!<br /> The physics tutorials are excellent! However, some of the links for the tutorials are not working properly, eg tutorials 12 and 13. Cheers</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>